<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stream of Consciousness &#187; Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truecreek.com/tag/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truecreek.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Now This is a Real Eye Opener.  Men Control the Shopping Cart?</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2011/01/17/now-this-is-a-real-eye-opener-men-control-the-shopping-cart/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2011/01/17/now-this-is-a-real-eye-opener-men-control-the-shopping-cart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions.  Everyone has them.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in alexandria virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years, it&#8217;s been a given that women were primary decision-makers in most households, especially in the grocery store. They were always the keeper of the checkbook.  But tough times can often change things and this recession has been no different.  We&#8217;re spending less and watching our dollars more closely than ever before.  But there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">For years, <strong>it&#8217;s been a given that women were primary decision-makers in most households, especially in the grocery store. </strong>They were always the keeper of the checkbook.  But tough times can often change things and this recession has been no different.  We&#8217;re spending less and watching our dollars more closely than ever before.  But there is something more to the story.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I would never have thought that <strong>more than half of the Men surveyed now think they control the grocery cart.  That is a HUGE shift from most current perceptions and might just mean a sea change in the way grocery stores market.  A new survey from Yahoo is striking in it&#8217;s results. </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/iStock_000011083082Small.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2448" title="Men Rule The Shopping Cart" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/iStock_000011083082Small.jpg" alt="" width="683" height="454" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">BATAVIA, Ohio (AdAge.com) &#8212; Mom is losing ground to Dad in the  grocery aisle, with more than half of men now supposedly believing they  control the shopping cart. The i<strong>mplications for many marketers may be as  disruptive as many of the changes they&#8217;re facing in media.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Through decades of media fragmentation, marketers of packaged goods and  many other brands could take solace in one thing &#8212; at least they c<strong>ould  count on their core consumers being moms and reach them through often  narrowly targeted cable TV, print and digital media.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But a study by Yahoo based on interviews last year of 2,400 U.S. men  ages 18 to 64 finds <strong>more than half now identify themselves as the  primary grocery shoppers in their households. </strong>Dads in particular are  taking up the shopping cart, with about six in 10 identifying themselves  as their household&#8217;s decision maker on packaged goods, health, pet and  clothing purchases. Not surprisingly, given that such ads long have been  crafted for women, only <strong>22% to 24% of men felt advertising in packaged  goods, pet supplies or clothing speaks to them, according to the Yahoo  survey.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Great Recession has thrown millions of men in construction,  manufacturing and other traditionally male occupations out of work and  by extension into more domestic duties. At the same time, gender roles  were already changing anyway, with <strong>Gen X and millennial men in  particular more likely to take an active role in parenting and household  duties.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a title="Men Control the Shopping Cart?" href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=148252" target="_blank">More about the story here. </a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2011/01/17/now-this-is-a-real-eye-opener-men-control-the-shopping-cart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBCU: Old Is the New Young.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2010/11/03/nbcu-old-is-the-new-young/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2010/11/03/nbcu-old-is-the-new-young/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Dam News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in alexandria virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=2391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By John Consoli NBC Universal wants advertisers to know that when it comes to consumer spending based on what they see in television ads, the 55-64 demo is the new 18-34—or it’s just as important as that younger demo. NBCU on Tuesday (Nov. 2) gave the media a sneak peek at a major presentation it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">By John Consoli</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">NBC Universal wants advertisers to know that when it <strong>comes to consumer spending based on what they see in television ads, the 55-64 demo is the new 18-34—or it’s just as important as that younger demo.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">NBCU on Tuesday (Nov. 2) gave the media a sneak peek at a major presentation it will make on Thursday to its advertisers, their media agencies and Nielsen officials. The <strong>presentation will offer data showing that the adult 55-64 demo is as vibrant as younger demos in ad spending, and should be targeted</strong> (and not ignored) when television marketing plans are created.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/iStock_000010297707Small.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2393" title="iStock_000010297707Small" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/iStock_000010297707Small.jpg" alt="" width="614" height="408" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Allen Wurtzel, president of research and media development at NBCU, presented evidence from assorted sources—including one-on-one interviews with adults in the demo—that <strong>dispel myths about how adults 55-64 respond to advertising and spend as consumers.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Wurtzel said the demo, which he’s labeled &#8220;AlphaBoomers,&#8221; &#8220;has been largely ignored by advertisers and marketers.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;Every seven seconds someone turns 55 and once they do, they are eliminated from the highest-end Nielsen demo measurement: 25-54,&#8221; Wurtzel said. &#8220;It is the <strong>fastest-growing demo group in the country </strong>and now numbers 35 million people that account for close to $2 trillion in annual spending.”</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Wurtzel said NBC research and a survey it commissioned of people in the 55-64 demo <strong>counters common perceptions that they make less of an income and spend less on advertised products; are technophobic and brand loyal, and therefore, cannot be motivated to switch brands.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">“Our goal is to raise a discussion among CMOs at the various companies and <strong>to get Nielsen to begin offering ratings data for the 55-64 demo</strong>,” Wurtzel said. “They have the data. It’s just a matter of creating the software and adding staff to distribute it.”</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Other findings include:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">* <strong>AphaBoomers spend more on home improvement products, home furnishing, large appliances, beauty and cosmetics and casual dining than adults 18-49.<br />
</strong><br />
* <strong>A similar percentage of AlphaBoomers have high-definition TVs, use DVRs and broadband as adults 18-34</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">* 70 percent of AlphaBoomers buy at least one product a month online</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">* 59 percent of AlphaBoomers send text messages via their cell phones</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">“This is not something that is just going to affect NBCU,” Wurtzel said. “Down the road as more people leave the 25-54 demo, it will affect every network.”</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/news/media-agencies-research/e3i5094e406e415c2806357b58512be3fb3">More here. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2010/11/03/nbcu-old-is-the-new-young/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Broadband 2010, a Pew Study.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2010/08/18/home-broadband-2010-a-pew-study/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2010/08/18/home-broadband-2010-a-pew-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in alexandria virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=2263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Aaron Smith. After several consecutive years of modest but consistent growth, broadband adoption slowed dramatically in 2010. Two-thirds of American adults (66%) currently use a high-speed Internet connection at home, a figure that is not statistically different from what The Pew Research Center’s Internet &#38; American Life Project found at a similar point in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Aaron Smith.</p>
<p><strong> </strong>After several consecutive years of modest but consistent growth, <strong>broadband adoption slowed dramatically in 2010.</strong> <strong>Two-thirds of American adults (66%) currently use a high-speed Internet connection at home,</strong> a figure that is not statistically different from what The Pew Research Center’s Internet &amp; American Life Project found at a similar point in 2009, when 63% of Americans were broadband adopters.</p>
<p>The lack of growth in broadband adoption at the national level was mirrored across a range of demographic groups, with African-Americans being a major exception. <strong>Broadband adoption by African-Americans now stands at 56%, up from 46% at a similar point in 2009.</strong> That works out to a 22% year-over-year growth rate, well above the national average and by far the highest growth rate of any major demographic group.</p>
<p><a title="Home Broadband 2010, a Pew Study." href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Home-Broadband-2010.aspx" target="_blank">Read more about Home Broadband 2010, a Pew Study, here. </a></p>
<p><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/iStock_000009439906Small.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2264" title="Home Internet" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/iStock_000009439906Small.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="449" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2010/08/18/home-broadband-2010-a-pew-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Metrics: Cinema Ads Click With Viewers.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2010/04/14/movie-metrics-cinema-ads-click-with-viewers/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2010/04/14/movie-metrics-cinema-ads-click-with-viewers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions.  Everyone has them.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in Northern Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=2025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Erik Sass A new report from the Cinema Advertising Council and NewMediaMetrics details consumers&#8217; emotional attachment to different media, as well as brands appearing in various media contexts. The findings suggest that cinema advertising can compete effectively with television for video advertising dollars. Movies fared better than most other media in terms of emotional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">By Erik Sass</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A new report from the Cinema Advertising Council and NewMediaMetrics details consumers&#8217; emotional attachment to different media, as well as brands appearing in various media contexts. <strong>The findings suggest that cinema advertising can compete effectively with television for video advertising dollars. </strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Movie-Metrics-Cinema-Ads-Click-With-Viewers..jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2027" title="Movie Metrics Cinema Ads Click With Viewers." src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Movie-Metrics-Cinema-Ads-Click-With-Viewers..jpg" alt="" width="606" height="403" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Movies fared better than most other media in terms of emotional attachment</strong>, reflecting their immersive quality, and the fact that consumers will pay a fair amount for such an experience.  CAC found that 44.5% of consumers that buy health and beauty products reported emotional attachment to movies, versus 29.6% for magazines, 21.2% for radio and 20.6% for magazines.  Similarly, <strong>43.9% of survey respondents who buy consumer packaged-goods and foods said they were emotionally attached to movies</strong>, compared to 28.9% for TV, 20.5% for magazines and 19.2% for magazines.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The data, summarized in CAC and NewMediaMetrics&#8217; &#8220;360 Cross Platform Study,&#8221; were gathered in a survey of more than 3,000 people ages 13-54, categorized by the type of products they consume. It asked them to rate emotional attachment to media and brands in media on an 11-point scale, with 9-10 considered &#8220;emotionally attached.&#8221; The survey compared consumer ratings for TV, magazines, newspapers, Internet, cinema and a variety of other out-of-home channels.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Across all consumer categories, the overall attachment rating of 41.5% for movies ranked ahead of televised sports and major entertainment events, such as the Super Bowl (39.7%), Summer Olympics (26.3%), World Series (22.8%) and Oscars (16.1%).</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Last year, the CAC released a study from Integrated Media Measurement showing that<strong> cinema advertising plus TV more than doubled consumer conversion rates when compared with TV alone.</strong><br />
The digital out-of-home industry in general has been working to bolster its measurement capabilities with new, more precise metrics in the hope of winning spending usually allocated to cable and broadcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2010/04/14/movie-metrics-cinema-ads-click-with-viewers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC: Broadband Adoption and Use in America.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2010/04/08/fcc-broadband-adoption-and-use-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2010/04/08/fcc-broadband-adoption-and-use-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions.  Everyone has them.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in alexandria virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=2017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, if these stats are correct, one could assume that  as much as 17% of the population that has not adopted broadband would do so if they understood the nuts and bolts of how it works? By Susannah Fox A new report released today by John B. Horrigan, formerly of Pew Internet and now at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">So, if these stats are correct, one <strong>could assume that  as much as 17% of the population that has not adopted broadband would do so if they understood the nuts and bolts of how it works?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">By Susannah Fox</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A new report released today by John B. Horrigan, formerly of Pew Internet and now at the Federal Communications Commission, finds that<strong> 78% of adults in the U.S. are Internet users and 65% of adults have home broadband access.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Web-Nuts-and-Bolts.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2019" title="web building" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Web-Nuts-and-Bolts.jpg" alt="" width="608" height="456" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Adults who <strong>do not have broadband</strong> at home fall into four categories:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Digitally Distant: </strong>10% of the general population. Median age is 63. Half say that the<strong> Internet is not relevant to their lives or they lack the digital literacy</strong> to adopt broadband.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Digital Hopefuls: </strong>8% of the general population<strong>.</strong> Low-income, heavily Hispanic and African American. <strong>Likely to say they want to go online, but lack the resources.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Digitally Uncomfortable: </strong>7% of the general population. Likely to own a computer,<strong> but lack skills and interest in taking advantage of all the Internet has to offer.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Near Converts: </strong>10% of the general population. Median age is 45. <strong>Cost is the biggest barrier to having broadband at home.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2010/04/08/fcc-broadband-adoption-and-use-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A 12-Step Program for Marketing Failure.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2010/03/12/a-12-step-program-for-marketing-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2010/03/12/a-12-step-program-for-marketing-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions.  Everyone has them.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=1968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tongue-in-cheek, but valuable none the less. By Steve Cuno We rarely hear about the fourth law of thermodynamics. In brief, it states that whenever a server says, “Careful, this plate is extremely hot,” an invisible force compels the customer to touch the plate. The compulsion grows as the cube of the number of decibels with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Tongue-in-cheek, but valuable none the less.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">By Steve Cuno</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We rarely hear about the fourth law of thermodynamics. In brief, it states that whenever a server says, “Careful, this plate is extremely hot,” an invisible force compels the customer to touch the plate. The compulsion grows as the cube of the number of decibels with which the server pronounces the word extremely.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It seems that,<strong> given a choice between heeding a voice of experience and sabotaging ourselves, many people do not just opt for, but positively execute, a mad dash for the latter.</strong> This can be as true of marketers as it is of other human-like creatures. So, for those who prefer wasting time and money, I offer the following personally witnessed, surefire shortcuts to screwing up your marketing. (I should add that narrowing it down to 12 wasn’t easy.)</p>
<p><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/iStock_000001285627XSmall.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1970" title="Oops!!" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/iStock_000001285627XSmall.jpg" alt="" width="613" height="407" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 1: <strong>Don’t set firm objectives</strong>. You’re much safer stating that your goal is to “get your name out there” or to advertise because the competition does. That way, even if sales tank, you can sit back and say, “I did my job.”</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 2: <strong>Put the goal where the ball lands.</strong> With a little practice, anyone can learn to retrofit objectives to results. Soon after a VP of marketing proudly showed me a new sales video, it became apparent that the video appealed to employees, but offended customers. No problem. The VP promptly claimed that the video was never intended for sales, but for training. George Orwell would have been proud.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 3: <strong>Write and design for internal approval</strong>. Authorize as many people as possible to revise or, better yet, outright veto creative work. This will ensure that creative people avoid trying to connect with the market. Instead, they will focus on creating what is sure to fly internally.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 4: <strong>It’s all about what YOU want.</strong> A major coffeehouse chain lost customers for years by refusing to fill the demand for lattes made with nonfat milk. Why did they resist? Because the CEO liked coffee the way it was made in Italy, and Italian baristas don’t use nonfat milk. Darned customers. What makes them think they should have a say in what they want in their coffee?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 5: <strong>Misuse research.</strong> Herd a bunch of people into a focus group and ask them to evaluate your campaign. Treat their comments, especially the ones you like, as if they’re statistically valid. You can also phone 5,000 people and ask them what they do, don’t, would and wouldn’t buy, and why. Assume they know.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 6: <strong>Don’t listen to your salespeople.</strong> The only thing that salespeople do is interact face-to-face, every day, with real customers who use your products. What would they know about marketing?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 7: <strong>If it’s wild and creative, go with it.</strong> If you have a killer concept that’s destined to take top honors at the next awards show, it would be a sin not to back it with your budget. Who cares whether it’s effective? It deserves to be shared!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 8: <strong>Avoid valid evidence</strong>. Proper testing and analysis let you reliably predict a direct mail strategy’s outcome before risking big bucks. But if nature had intended for us to conduct valid, predictive tests, we wouldn’t have hips to shoot from. Showing the concept to coworkers, friends, family and people in a mall, though not predictive, is faster and easier. And, only in the short run, cheaper.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 9: <strong>Don’t trust your agency.</strong> Your agency may have experts on staff, but you can still hobble them by overruling their expertise with your intuition. You can also focus on minutiae. For instance, make the art director change a border on that mail piece from black to dark blue.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 10: <strong>Trust your agency.</strong> Not trusting experts is self-sabotage, but so is trusting non-experts. Many agencies, figuring they can affix stamps as well as anyone, list “direct response marketing” as a core capability. If you are firmly committed to failure, this is no time for due diligence. Just hand them the checkbook.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 11: <strong>Mistake a slogan for a brand.</strong> Imagine a person who is fast losing friends. This person might do well to take an honest look, figure out what alienates people and make changes. But substance is such a bother. Surely this person could more easily regain friends by learning to say something like, “Hi, I’m Alex—where coolness is Number One.”</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sabotage Tip 12: <strong>Disdain proven techniques.</strong> For nearly two centuries, direct response marketers have amassed information on what works in the marketplace. Moreover, experience shows that what worked yesterday works today. But learning all that stuff is tedious, and using it might hamper your creativity. Mustn’t let that happen.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There are many ways to sabotage marketing, but this should give you a good start. If you fail to implement these recommendations, don’t come whining to me if your marketing succeeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2010/03/12/a-12-step-program-for-marketing-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the Participatory News Consumer.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2010/03/01/understanding-the-participatory-news-consumer/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2010/03/01/understanding-the-participatory-news-consumer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Dam News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in alexandria virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online news consumption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=1922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting Pew Study. by Kristen Purcell, Lee Rainie, Amy Mitchell, Tom Rosenstiel, Kenny Olmstead. The overwhelming majority of Americans (92%) use multiple platforms to get their daily news, according to a new survey conducted jointly by the Pew Research Center’s Internet &#38; American Life Project and Project for Excellence in Journalism. The Internet is now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Interesting Pew Study.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">by Kristen Purcell, Lee Rainie, Amy Mitchell, Tom Rosenstiel, Kenny Olmstead.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The <strong>overwhelming majority of Americans (92%) use multiple platforms to get their daily news</strong>, according to a new survey conducted jointly by the Pew Research Center’s Internet &amp; American Life Project and Project for Excellence in Journalism.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The <strong>Internet is now the third most-popular news platform, behind local and national television news and ahead of national print newspapers, local print newspapers and radio.</strong> Getting news online fits into a broad pattern of news consumption by Americans; six in ten (59%) get news from a combination of online and offline sources on a typical day.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Understanding-the-Participatory-News-Consumer..jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1923" title="Understanding the Participatory News Consumer." src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Understanding-the-Participatory-News-Consumer..jpg" alt="" width="607" height="389" /></a><br />
The <strong>internet and mobile technologies are at the center of the story of how people’s relationship to news is changing.</strong> In today’s new multi-platform media environment, news is becoming portable, personalized, and participatory:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">* Portable: 33% of cell phone owners now access news on their cell phones.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">* Personalized: 28% of Internet users have customized their home page to include news from sources and on topics that particularly interest them.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">* Participatory: 37% of Internet users have contributed to the creation of news, commented about it, or disseminated it via postings on social media sites like Facebook or Twitter.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In addition, people use their social networks and social networking technology to filter, assess, and react to news. And <strong>they use traditional email and other tools to swap stories and comment on them. Among those who get news online, 75% get news forwarded through email or posts on social networking sites and 52% share links to news with others via those means.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Despite all of this online activity, the typical online news consumer routinely uses just a handful of news sites and does not have a particular favorite. And overall, Americans have mixed feelings about this “new” news environment. <strong>Over half (55%) say it is easier to keep up with news and information today than it was five years ago, but 70% feel the amount of news and information available from different sources is overwhelming.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><a title="Understanding the Participatory News Consumer" href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Online-News.aspx" target="_blank">Take a look at the study and download it here.</a><br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2010/03/01/understanding-the-participatory-news-consumer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet, Broadband and Cell Phone Statistics.  A Pew Study.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2010/01/26/internet-broadband-and-cell-phone-statistics-a-pew-study/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2010/01/26/internet-broadband-and-cell-phone-statistics-a-pew-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Dam News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in alexandria virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=1884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These statistics are holding steady. By Lee Rainie: In a national survey between November 30 and December 27, 2009, we find: 74% of American adults (ages 18 and older) use the Internet, a slight drop from our survey in April 2009, which did not include Spanish interviews. At that time we found that 79% of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">These statistics are holding steady.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">By Lee Rainie:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In a national survey between November 30 and December 27, 2009, we find:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>74% of American adults (ages 18 and older) use the Internet</strong>, a slight drop from our survey in April 2009, which did not include Spanish interviews. At that time we found that 79% of English speaking adults use the Internet.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>60% of American adults use broadband connections at home, </strong>a drop that is within the margin of error from 63% in April 2009.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>55% of American adults connect to the Internet wirelessly</strong>, either through a WiFi or WiMax connection via their laptops or through their handheld device like a smart phone. This figure did not change in a statistically significant way during 2009.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/WWW.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1885" title="WWW" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/WWW.jpg" alt="" width="611" height="406" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">These data come from the Pew Research Center’s Internet &amp; American Life Project. The most recent survey was conducted from November 30 to December 27, 2009, using landline and cell phones and including interviews in Spanish. Some 2,258 adults were interviewed and the overall sample has a margin of error of ± 2 percentage points.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a title="Internet, Broadband and Cell Phone Statistics.  " href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Internet-broadband-and-cell-phone-statistics.aspx" target="_blank">Download the entire Internet, broadband and cell phone statistics survey here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2010/01/26/internet-broadband-and-cell-phone-statistics-a-pew-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boys vs. Girls on Cellphones.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2010/01/26/boys-vs-girls-on-cellphones/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2010/01/26/boys-vs-girls-on-cellphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions.  Everyone has them.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in alexandria virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=1876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting research from the University of Alabama at Birmingham.   It&#8217;s a hot topic of discussion here at True Creek, for sure. The premise was also the theme for a recent episode of &#8216;Modern Family&#8217; on ABC. By Margaret Shapiro We&#8217;ve heard about the gender divide in knowledge and use of technology. It seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Very interesting research from the University of Alabama at Birmingham.   It&#8217;s a <strong>hot topic of discussion here at True Creek, for sure. </strong> The premise was also the theme for a recent episode of &#8216;Modern Family&#8217; on ABC.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">By Margaret Shapiro</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We&#8217;ve heard about the <strong>gender divide in knowledge and use of technology. It seems the gap may start with the simplest of technologies &#8212; cellphones &#8212; and at a fairly young age &#8212; middle school.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For a study published in December in the journal New Media and Society, University of Alabama at Birmingham sociologist Shelia Cotten asked nearly 1,000 middle school students to rate the different ways they used their cellphones.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The results showed<strong> boys much more than girls used their phones to play games, share photos and videos, listen to music and send e-mails. Girls tended to use their phones primarily for talking and or text messaging.</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Boys-vs.-Girls-on-cellphones.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1878" title="Boys vs. Girls on cellphones" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Boys-vs.-Girls-on-cellphones.jpg" alt="" width="609" height="405" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">To the researchers&#8217; surprise, the boys used the phones for talking and texting just as much as the girls &#8212; in other words, they didn&#8217;t use the &#8220;complicated features&#8221; instead of socializing, but in addition to it. &#8220;We would&#8217;ve expected that girls would use cellphones for talking and texting because females are socialized to communicate more with others than males,&#8221; said Cotten in an online video presentation of her research, &#8220;but there were no differences.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;By these study results, we aren&#8217;t saying that parents should buy phones with fewer features for girls,&#8221; she said. &#8220;But it <strong>does point out how much more needs to be done to teach girls&#8221; about technology. &#8220;Females traditionally have perceived themselves as less skilled in terms of technology, especially with regard to computers.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Cotten said that <strong>60 to 70 percent of middle school kids report owning a cellphone.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a title="Boys vs. Girls on Cellphones" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/25/AR2010012503037.html?sub=AR" target="_blank">More about Boys vs. Girls on Cellphones here.</a><strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2010/01/26/boys-vs-girls-on-cellphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey: TV More Popular Than Internet for Entertainment.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2009/12/16/survey-tv-more-popular-than-internet-for-entertainment/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2009/12/16/survey-tv-more-popular-than-internet-for-entertainment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Dam News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=1656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By David Lieberman, Associated Press The Internet and tech toys get the headlines. But the vast majority of Americans still turn to their familiar televisions, radios, and CDs when they want to be informed and entertained, according a consumer tracking survey released Tuesday by the NPD Group. &#8220;There&#8217;s a perception that families spending time in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">By David Lieberman, Associated Press</p>
<p>The Internet and tech toys get the headlines. But the <strong>vast majority of Americans still turn to their familiar televisions, radios, and CDs when they want to be informed and entertained</strong>, according a consumer tracking survey released Tuesday by the NPD Group.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/iStock_000000402373Small.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1658" title="iStock_000000402373Small" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/iStock_000000402373Small.jpg" alt="iStock_000000402373Small" width="714" height="475" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;There&#8217;s a perception that families spending time in front of a glowing TV hearth has been replaced by glowing laptop or iPod displays,&#8221; NPD analyst Russ Cupnick says in a release. While true for some, <strong>&#8220;TV remains the top entertainment choice by far in the United States.&#8221; </strong></p>
<p>More than 80% of the country watches an average of 10 hours a week of non-movie TV programming, according to the online survey of 10,281 people in August, weighted to reflect the general population.</p>
<p>After that:</p>
<p>*  <strong>78% said that they listened to music on a traditional AM/FM radio sometime during the prior week.</strong><br />
* 70% sent an instant message or e-mail.<br />
* 60% listened to music on a CD.<br />
* And 58% watched a movie on TV, not including pay-per-view or video-on-demand.</p>
<p>But the survey found that <strong>online is becoming an increasingly important part of the mix.</strong> Some 47% of the respondants visited a social networking site the prior week.</p>
<p>Read the entire survey, entitled <a title="Survey:  TV More Popular Than Internet for Entertainment." href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2009/12/survey-says-tv-still-beats-tech/1" target="_blank">&#8220;TV More Popular Than Internet for Entertainment&#8221; here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2009/12/16/survey-tv-more-popular-than-internet-for-entertainment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rise of the Real Mom.  An AA Whitepaper.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2009/12/07/the-rise-of-the-real-mom-an-aa-whitepaper/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2009/12/07/the-rise-of-the-real-mom-an-aa-whitepaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Dam News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in Northern Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=1611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real moms still have unmet needs—as women and mothers. Boston Consulting Group estimates that women control $4.3 trillion of the $5.9 trillion in U.S. consumer spending, or 73% of household spending. To reach this demographic, marketers need not just to communicate that the goods and services they offer are practical and convenient; they also need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Real moms still have unmet needs—as women and mothers. Boston Consulting Group estimates that<strong> women control $4.3 trillion of the $5.9 trillion in U.S. consumer spending, or 73% of household spending. </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/The-Rise-of-the-Real-Mom.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1614" title="Mother with baby." src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/The-Rise-of-the-Real-Mom.jpg" alt="Mother with baby." width="693" height="693" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">To reach this demographic, marketers need not just to communicate that the goods and services they offer are practical and convenient; <strong>they also need to make real moms feel confident and in charge. </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Marketers should <strong>empower these female consumers to delegate to others</strong> (spouses, children,brands) so they can have more time to be who they want to be—at home, at work and on their own.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And marketers have to use new ways to reach a population that <strong>rarely has time to sit down to read or watch or enjoy something</strong> without simultaneously doing something else.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read the entire report about marketing to moms <a title="The Rise of the Real Mom.  An AA Whitepaper.  " href="http://adage.com/images/random/1109/aa-newfemale-whitepaper.pdf" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2009/12/07/the-rise-of-the-real-mom-an-aa-whitepaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans Are Not as Isolated As Had Been Previously Reported.  A Pew Study.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2009/11/13/americans-are-not-as-isolated-as-had-been-previously-reported-a-pew-study/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2009/11/13/americans-are-not-as-isolated-as-had-been-previously-reported-a-pew-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Dam News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in alexandria virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=1437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Keith Hampton, Lauren Sessions, Eun Ja Her, Lee Rainie This report adds new insights to an ongoing debate about the extent of social isolation in America. A widely-reported 2006 study argued that since 1985 Americans have become more socially isolated, the size of their discussion networks has declined, and the diversity of those people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">By Keith Hampton, Lauren Sessions, Eun Ja Her, Lee Rainie</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This report adds <strong>new insights</strong> to an ongoing debate about the extent of social isolation in America. A widely-reported 2006 study <strong>argued that</strong> <strong>since 1985 Americans have become more socially isolated</strong>, the size of their discussion networks has declined, and the diversity of those people with whom they discuss important matters has decreased.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/iStock_000003906452Smallblue.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1454" title="iStock_000003906452Smallblue" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/iStock_000003906452Smallblue.jpg" alt="iStock_000003906452Smallblue" width="586" height="439" /></a>In particular, the study found that Americans have fewer close ties to those from their neighborhoods and from voluntary associations. Sociologists Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin and Matthew Brashears suggest that new technologies, such as the Internet and mobile phone, may play a role in advancing this trend.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Specifically, they argue that the type of <strong>social ties supported by these technologies are relatively weak and geographically dispersed</strong>, not the strong, often locally-based ties that tend to be a part of peoples’ core discussion network.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">They depicted the rise of <strong>Internet and mobile phones as one of the major trends that pulls people away</strong> from traditional social settings, neighborhoods, voluntary associations, and public spaces that have been associated with large and diverse core networks.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The survey results reported here were undertaken to explore issues that have not been probed directly in that study and other related research on social isolation: the role of the Internet and mobile phone in people’s core social networks.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This Pew Internet Personal Networks and Community survey finds that <strong>Americans are not as isolated as has been previously reported. </strong>People’s use of the mobile phone and the Internet is associated with <strong>larger and more diverse discussion networks.</strong> And, when we examine people’s full personal network – their strong and weak ties – Internet use in general and use of social networking services such as Facebook in particular are associated with<strong> </strong>more diverse social networks.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">More <a title="Social Isolation and New Technology.  A Pew Study.  " href="http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/18--Social-Isolation-and-New-Technology.aspx" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2009/11/13/americans-are-not-as-isolated-as-had-been-previously-reported-a-pew-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

