<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stream of Consciousness &#187; email blasts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truecreek.com/tag/email-blasts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truecreek.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who Is Most Engaged with E-Mail?</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2009/09/14/who-is-most-engaged-with-e-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2009/09/14/who-is-most-engaged-with-e-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Dam News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency in Northern Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email blasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=1218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By eMarketer While the differences between Webmail properties such as Yahoo! Mail, Gmail, AOL and Hotmail may seem subtle, their user bases do not behave alike. A study of success metrics for marketing e-mails sent through MailChimp’s distribution service showed that Gmail users were most likely to open and click on e-mails. Open rates varied [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By eMarketer</p>
<p>While the differences between Webmail properties such as Yahoo! Mail, Gmail, AOL and Hotmail may seem subtle, <strong>their user bases do not behave alike.</strong> A study of success metrics for marketing e-mails sent through MailChimp’s distribution service showed that <strong>Gmail users were most likely to open and click on e-mails. </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Who-is-most-engaged-by-email.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1221" title="Who is most engaged  by email" src="http://truecreek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Who-is-most-engaged-by-email.jpg" alt="Who is most engaged  by email" width="653" height="558" /></a>Open rates varied from a low of just over 20% for e-mail sent to AOL users to a high over nearly 31% among Gmail users. <strong>The click rate on e-mails sent to Gmail accounts was more than 7.4%, compared with rates between 4% and 5% for Yahoo!, AOL and Hotmail users. </strong> Messages sent to Gmail accounts also had the lowest hard bounce rate, though other data indicates Gmail’s spam protection may be so stringent that messages disappear without producing a bounce.</p>
<p><strong>A 2009 Return Path study, for example, found a 23% nondelivery rate for marketing messages sent to Gmail.</strong> According to comScore, Gmail is the third-most-popular e-mail property among US Internet users, though it posted the highest growth rate between July 2008 and July 2009.</p>
<p>Unique visitors to the service rose 46% to nearly 37 million.  Yahoo! Mail and Windows Live Hotmail had significantly more visitors, at about 106 million and 47 million, respectively.</p>
<p>MailChimp suggests that demographic factors could be at work when it comes to the willingness of Gmail users to open and click on marketing e-mails, so the service’s continuing growth could bring its metrics closer to the average.</p>
<p><strong>But for now, the user base may be particularly friendly to e-mail marketing.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2009/09/14/who-is-most-engaged-with-e-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huge Bump in Surfing the Web By Phone.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2009/04/06/huge-bump-in-surfing-the-web-by-phone/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2009/04/06/huge-bump-in-surfing-the-web-by-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>truecreek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Dam News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email blasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.com/?p=499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Heidi Dawley Mar 19, 2009 Mobile internet may have taken time to find its footing with consumers, but now it is powering along, gaining users at a fast clip. What’s more it has moved beyond just an occasional toy for a rapidly increasing group of people. The number of people who access news and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">By Heidi Dawley<br />
Mar 19, 2009</p>
<p>Mobile internet may have taken time to find its footing with consumers, but now it is powering along, gaining users at a fast clip.</p>
<p>What’s more it has moved beyond just an occasional toy for a rapidly increasing group of people.</p>
<p>The number of people who access news and information on the internet on a daily basis more than doubled in the last year, rising to 22.4 million in January from 10.8 million in the same month in 2008, according to a new study from ComScore.</p>
<p>“It is now more than a novelty. It is something that is a utility,” says Mark Donovan, senior vice president for mobile at comScore.</p>
<p>The transformation for mobile stems directly from improved web technology and a dramatic improvement in content.</p>
<p>In many ways the change is similar to what happened with internet access via the PC some years ago. In the early days, when dial-up ruled and content was limited, people might surf a bit each month. It was still a novelty. It became a daily habit as more content became available and fast internet connections gained over dial-up.</p>
<p>“You saw how the computer became knitted into the fabric of their lives. That’s now happening with the mobile phone,” says Donovan.</p>
<p>Another factor is handsets that are handier for surfing, but as comScore points out, it&#8217;s not just smartphones like Apple’s iPhone. It found that 70 percent of people accessing mobile internet content were using phones with lesser features.</p>
<p>The big draw for mobile surfers is news and information. ComScore found that the number of mobile users who visited such sites on a daily basis has more than doubled, rising 107 percent, to 22.4 million, by January as compared the prior January.</p>
<p>But the fastest-growing category in terms of the number of daily users is social networks and blogs. The number accessing these sites was up 427 percent to 9.2 million.</p>
<p>The third-biggest category was financial services, trading stocks, and accessing bank accounts and the like. That was up 188 percent, to 3.2 million daily users. This is also a category that Donovan believes is likely to continue growing rapidly.</p>
<p>For advertisers the rapid shift to accessing the web via mobile phones makes this area far more appealing, says Donovan.</p>
<p>“We have shown that mobile is sizable audience, it is frequently used by 35 percent daily. Plus a big portion of those people are additive, in that advertiser wouldn’t get them by just advertising on the PC web,” he says.</p>
<p>He is referring to some previous comScore research that showed that light PC internet users are 30 percent more likely to be using the mobile internet. So mobile is a key way to reach them.</p>
<p>What’s more, the people who are surfing from their phones are a nice sweet spot for advertising, believes Donovan. They tend to be men ages 18-35, who are highly connected and highly distracted. The mobile phone is their connection to the digital world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2009/04/06/huge-bump-in-surfing-the-web-by-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You May Not Know the Term, &#8216;Johnson Box&#8217;, But if You&#8217;ve Ever Looked at a Direct Mail Piece, You&#8217;ve Probably Seen One.</title>
		<link>http://truecreek.com/2009/02/23/you-may-not-know-the-term-johnson-box-but-if-youve-ever-looked-at-a-direct-mail-piece-youve-probably-seen-one/</link>
		<comments>http://truecreek.com/2009/02/23/you-may-not-know-the-term-johnson-box-but-if-youve-ever-looked-at-a-direct-mail-piece-youve-probably-seen-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wordwrangler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions.  Everyone has them.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email blasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improve direct mail response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postscript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecreek.wordpress.com/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Johnson Box is a part of a direct mail piece or letter that contains the key message, so named because it has been credited to direct marketer Frank Johnson. Frank, a modest man apparently, claimed he did not actually create it, but only popularized its use. Frank simply wanted to improve response to his offers for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0 0;line-height:14.25pt;text-align:justify;">
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;  12.00  &lt;![endif]--></p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;  Normal 0     false false false  EN-US X-NONE X-NONE              MicrosoftInternetExplorer4              &lt;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;                                                                                                                                            &lt;![endif]--></p>
<p>A Johnson Box is a part of a <strong>direct mail piece or letter </strong>that contains the key message, so named because it has been credited to direct marketer Frank Johnson.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;text-align:justify;">Frank, a modest man apparently, claimed he did not actually create it, but only popularized its use.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;text-align:justify;">Frank simply wanted to <strong>improve response</strong> to his offers for American Heritage magazine. He thought his box would capture the reader’s attention and entice them to read the whole letter.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;text-align:justify;">Old Frank was right, and today most direct marketers employ the device. But as times changed, so did the technique of using the Johnson Box.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;text-align:justify;">Today, you may find it in the middle or off to the side of the page or even down by the order form. <strong>In email blasts, the Johnson Box is the subject line.</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;text-align:justify;">So the next time you write a direct mail letter, add a Johnson Box. And the next time you read such a letter, see if it doesn’t jump right out at you.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;text-align:justify;"><strong>P.S.</strong> Effective direct mail also includes a P.S., but that’s a whole ‘nother story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truecreek.com/2009/02/23/you-may-not-know-the-term-johnson-box-but-if-youve-ever-looked-at-a-direct-mail-piece-youve-probably-seen-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

